Does Defining More Anchors on Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales Increase Rater Accuracy in Employment Interviews?

dc.contributor.advisor Frame, Mark
dc.contributor.author Iseral, Mary
dc.contributor.committeemember Hein, Michael
dc.contributor.committeemember Urban, David
dc.date.accessioned 2020-04-24T22:11:31Z
dc.date.available 2020-04-24T22:11:31Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.date.updated 2020-04-24T22:11:31Z
dc.description.abstract While the use of behaviorally anchored rating scales for employee selection has been researched in the past, little research has been conducted regarding how many anchors should include behavioral descriptions on BARS. This study sought to determine if including five examples on BARS would increase rater accuracy when compared to BARS with three examples. Participants were recruited from Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (MTurk). Participants viewed videos of a person interviewing for a professor position at a university and then rated the respondent’s answers. The results demonstrated that BARS with five examples result in less over and under ratings on employment interviews when compared to three example BARS. There were no other significant differences in accuracy between three example BARS and five example BARS.
dc.description.degree M.A.
dc.identifier.uri https://jewlscholar.mtsu.edu/handle/mtsu/6190
dc.language.rfc3066 en
dc.publisher Middle Tennessee State University
dc.subject Behavioral psychology
dc.thesis.degreegrantor Middle Tennessee State University
dc.thesis.degreelevel masters
dc.title Does Defining More Anchors on Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales Increase Rater Accuracy in Employment Interviews?
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Iseral_mtsu_0170N_11267.pdf
Size:
2.68 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections