MODEL COMPARISONS AMONG TESTLET RESPONSE THEORIES (TRT) ON A READING COMPREHENSION TEST

dc.contributor.advisor Kim, Jwa en_US
dc.contributor.author Kim, Kyungtae en_US
dc.contributor.committeemember Elleman, Amy en_US
dc.contributor.committeemember Magne, Cyrille en_US
dc.contributor.department Education en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2015-06-12T19:03:26Z
dc.date.available 2015-06-12T19:03:26Z
dc.date.issued 2015-04-08 en_US
dc.description.abstract The purpose of this study was to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of psychometric models such as Classical Test Theory (CTT), Item Response Theory (IRT), and Testlet Response Theory (TRT) as well as test items of a fifth grade reading comprehension test with a large data set (N = 10,897). The reading comprehension test contained 22 items with 7 passages along with 4 areas of reading standards of literature (RL), reading standards of informational text (RI), reading standards of foundation skills (RF), and language standards (L) of Common Core State Standards (CCSS). The 22-item showed a good internal consistency reliability index with the Cronbach's alpha of .79. The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) confirmed that the data could be analyzed with the traditional IRT analyses because the data showed a unidimensional solution. The model comparison criteria (-2LL, AIC, and BIC) revealed that the 3PLM was the best-fitting model for the data when compared with 1PLM and 2PLM. Comparisons of the results from CTT and 3PLM addressed the advantages of IRT over CTT with more item information (a, b, c-parameter estimates) along with detailed understandings of the item parameters for specific students' ability levels. The -2LL, AIC, BIC illustrated that local item dependence (LID) among test items was minimal in the 5th grade reading comprehension test so unidimensional IRT was more appropriate than the TRT models. However, several testlet variances from the generalized TRT model indicated that the testlet effects were not negligible. The 3PLM, constrained TRT, and generalized TRT models provided consistent ability estimations with a mean of 0.00 and standard deviation of 1.00. Two item parameter estimates (a and c-parameters) except the item difficulty parameter (bi) were highly correlated among 3PLM and two TRT models. The b-parameters were associated with the estimated testlet mean. In this study, comparisons of psychometric models and test item parameters among CTT, IRT and TRTs on a reading comprehension test are meaningful for both researchers and practitioners to achieve the precise evaluation of a reading comprehension test. en_US
dc.description.degree Ph.D. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://jewlscholar.mtsu.edu/handle/mtsu/4452
dc.publisher Middle Tennessee State University en_US
dc.subject CTT en_US
dc.subject IRT en_US
dc.subject Item difficulty en_US
dc.subject Item discrimination en_US
dc.subject Psychometric models en_US
dc.subject TRT en_US
dc.subject.umi Educational tests & measurements en_US
dc.thesis.degreegrantor Middle Tennessee State University en_US
dc.thesis.degreelevel Doctoral en_US
dc.title MODEL COMPARISONS AMONG TESTLET RESPONSE THEORIES (TRT) ON A READING COMPREHENSION TEST en_US
dc.type Dissertation en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Kim_mtsu_0170E_10390.pdf
Size:
2.18 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: