A comparison of two shoulder exercises utilizing isotonic, isokinetic, and electromyographic analyses.

dc.contributor.authorDurbin, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.departmentHPERSen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-20T16:10:00Z
dc.date.available2014-06-20T16:10:00Z
dc.date.issued1993en_US
dc.description.abstractThis purpose of this study was to compare the seated side-lateral raise to the seated behind-the-neck press exercises, utilizing isotonic, isokinetic, and electromyographic analyses. Sixty-four male students participated in this study. Experimental group A (N = 22) used the seated side-lateral raise exercise. Experimental group B (N = 23) used the seated behind-the-neck press exercise. Control group C (N = 19) used no treatment.en_US
dc.description.abstractSubjects for the experimental groups performed 10 pretest and posttest repetitions at maximum weight with their particular exercise. The difference determined isotonic gains. Experimental groups A and B and control group C were tested for shoulder abduction isokinetic strength on the Cybex 340 at 60 degrees per second and 180 degrees per second.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe pretest was followed by a 10-week treatment period for experimental groups A and B. The treatment for both experimentals group A and B consisted of three sets of 10 repetitions of the seated side-lateral raise. The treatment for experimental group B consisted of three sets of 10 repetitions. Control group C had no treatment for the 10-week period. Five volunteers participated in the electromyography study. The muscles analyzed were the anterior, middle and posterior deltoids; the triceps; and the supraspinatus. Each subject performed three repetitions for the seated side-lateral raise and the seated behind-the-neck press.en_US
dc.description.abstractResults showed that after a 10-week treatment period, both experimental groups A and B showed significantly greater weight gains isotonically. Isokinetically, there was no significant difference at 60 degrees per second among groups A, B, and C. At 180 degrees per second, there was no difference between groups A and B. There was significance between groups A and C and significance between groups B and C.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe results of the electromyographic analyses showed that during the seated side-lateral raise, the posterior deltoid and the triceps were the least involved. The supraspinatus was the most involved, followed by the anterior and middle deltoids. During the seated behind-the-neck press, the posterior deltoid was the least involved, followed by the anterior and middle deltoids. The muscles most involved were the triceps and supraspinatus for this exercise.en_US
dc.description.degreeD.A.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://jewlscholar.mtsu.edu/handle/mtsu/3840
dc.publisherMiddle Tennessee State Universityen_US
dc.subject.lcshShoulderen_US
dc.subject.lcshElectromyographyen_US
dc.subject.lcshEducation, Physicalen_US
dc.subject.lcshBiology, Animal Physiologyen_US
dc.subject.lcshHealth Sciences, Rehabilitation and Therapyen_US
dc.thesis.degreegrantorMiddle Tennessee State Universityen_US
dc.thesis.degreelevelDoctoralen_US
dc.titleA comparison of two shoulder exercises utilizing isotonic, isokinetic, and electromyographic analyses.en_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
9401183.pdf
Size:
2.9 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format