Factors affecting running economy: An examination of the visual assessment of running economy and the influence of footwear

dc.contributor.advisorCaputo, Jenniferen_US
dc.contributor.authorCochrum, Roberten_US
dc.contributor.committeememberCoons, Johnen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberFuller, Danaen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberMorgan, Donen_US
dc.contributor.departmentHealth & Human Performanceen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-12T19:03:22Z
dc.date.available2015-06-12T19:03:22Z
dc.date.issued2014-12-05en_US
dc.description.abstractABSTRACTen_US
dc.description.abstractPersons with a good running economy (RE) consume less oxygen per unit of body mass than those with poor RE at the same velocity. While many factors affect RE, the extent footwear can affect RE remains elusive. Furthermore, the capability of distance running coaches to visually differentiate runners by RE is unknown. The first study compared RE and step frequency (SF) among recreational distance runners at 50% and 70% of velocity at VO2max (vVO2max), while running barefoot, in minimal shoes, and in normal running shoes. The second study determined the ability of distance-running coaches to visually classify runners by RE and identify the criteria used to rank the runners.en_US
dc.description.abstractIn the first study, RE was not significantly altered by footwear at either 50% vVO2max (p = .89) or 70% vVO2max (p = .13). However, large individual variations in RE were seen in certain runners across footwear conditions. Running barefoot produced higher SF than running in the minimal condition at 50% vVO2max (p = .007). At 70% vVO2max, SF was higher in the barefoot condition than both the minimal (p < .001) and standard conditions (p < .001). Furthermore, there was a higher SF in the minimal condition than the standard condition at 70% vVO2max (p = .007). In the second study, the coaches classified 17.9% of runners or less than 1 in 5 runners correctly. Neither years coaching (r = .12, p = .184) nor years in competitive running (r = -.06, p = .484) were related to the accuracy of classifying RE. Overall, footwear did not significantly affect RE despite individual variations and significant differences in step frequency among the shoe conditions. Runners should consider individual biomechanical and physiological traits before making a footwear change in order to improve RE. Furthermore, the ability of distance running coaches to rank RE was not shown to be accurate or related to coaching characteristics. Consideration should be given to bridging the gap between coaching knowledge and the scientific literature.en_US
dc.description.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://jewlscholar.mtsu.edu/handle/mtsu/4443
dc.publisherMiddle Tennessee State Universityen_US
dc.subjectBarefoot runningen_US
dc.subjectMinimal shoesen_US
dc.subject.umiKinesiologyen_US
dc.thesis.degreegrantorMiddle Tennessee State Universityen_US
dc.thesis.degreelevelDoctoralen_US
dc.titleFactors affecting running economy: An examination of the visual assessment of running economy and the influence of footwearen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Cochrum_mtsu_0170E_10353.pdf
Size:
1.02 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format