INVESTIGATIONS OF OPTIMAL LOADING DURING RESISTANCE TRAINING

dc.contributor.advisor Coons, John M.
dc.contributor.author Mehls, Kelton David
dc.contributor.committeemember Stevens, Sandra
dc.contributor.committeemember Grubbs, Brandon
dc.contributor.committeemember Jin, Ying
dc.date.accessioned 2019-10-07T12:45:12Z
dc.date.available 2019-10-07T12:45:12Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.date.updated 2019-10-07T12:45:13Z
dc.description.abstract Resistance training is widely accepted as a superior method for enhancing muscle size, strength, and athletic performance, making appropriate resistance training prescription a priority for strength coaches and personal trainers. The purpose of the first study was to identify the loads that produced the greatest amount of muscle activity in the vastus lateralis (VL), vastus medialis (VM), rectus femoris (RF), gluteus maximus (GM), semitendinosus (ST), and bicep femoris (BF) muscles in resistance trained females (N = 20). The second study aimed to determine the training load which optimizes peak power (PP) output and peak rate of force development (RFD) in male youth athletes during the hang power clean (N = 16). When examining the muscle activity of the six muscles during the back squat, the most interesting finding was that the GM produced more muscle activity at 80% and 90% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) than at 1RM (ratios of 1.01 and 1.03, respectively) during the ascending phase of the squat. It was also found that the VM produced its greatest amount of muscle activity at 80% of 1RM in both the descending and ascending phase of the squat (ratios of 1.11 and 1.03, respectively). Strength coaches and trainers can use this information to prescribe specific loads to target muscles during the back squat. The second study examined the load which optimizes PP and peak RFD in youth athletes during the hang power clean. It was found that PP was greatest at 80% of 1RM which was significantly greater than 30%, 40%, 50%, and 60% (p < 0.05) of 1RM, but not significantly greater than 70% or 90% of 1RM. Peak RFD was greatest at 70% of 1RM (11663.672 N·Sec-1) which was significantly greater than 30% and 40% (p < 0.05) of 1RM, but not significantly greater than 50%, 60%, 80% or 90% of 1RM. Strength and conditioning practitioners should use this knowledge to prescribe loads to maximize PP and RFD based on the athlete and goal of the training session.
dc.description.degree Ph.D.
dc.identifier.uri https://jewlscholar.mtsu.edu/handle/mtsu/6077
dc.language.rfc3066 en
dc.publisher Middle Tennessee State University
dc.subject Physiology
dc.subject Sedimentary geology
dc.thesis.degreegrantor Middle Tennessee State University
dc.thesis.degreelevel doctoral
dc.title INVESTIGATIONS OF OPTIMAL LOADING DURING RESISTANCE TRAINING
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Mehls_mtsu_0170E_11194.pdf
Size:
515.46 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: