Emergency Life Support for Vulnerable Collections: A Collections Management Case Study on The Anderson Collection
Emergency Life Support for Vulnerable Collections: A Collections Management Case Study on The Anderson Collection
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2024
Authors
Chavis, AnnaLevi Collier
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Middle Tennessee State University
Abstract
This thesis presents a detailed case study on the Anderson Collection, a large collection of Indigenous artifacts gathered by amateur archaeologist. This collection, now under the care of the Tennessee Division of Archaeology (TDOA), offers a unique lens through which to explore issues of collections management, emergency intake, and the broader implications of amateur archaeological contributions. The research emphasizes the importance of adopting best practices in the curation and continued care of legacy collections, particularly those with complex backgrounds involving amateur archaeologists and Indigenous artifacts.
Through an interdisciplinary approach that includes heritage legislation, ethical considerations, and decolonization practices, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of the intersection between current changes in care practices for Native collections, issues with avocational archaeology, and professional standards. The narrative of the Anderson Collection is used to illustrate broader themes in collections management, highlighting the urgent need for policies that ensure the preservation, ethical treatment, and educational use of archaeological collections. By framing collections care in emergency medical terminology, the thesis underscores the critical and ongoing attention required to maintain the integrity and research potential of such collections.
The findings advocate for a collaborative approach that prioritizes Indigenous voices, includes community stakeholders, and aligns with modern movements towards decolonizing archaeology and cultural heritage management. The recommendations aim to enhance transparency, accountability, and inclusivity in the curation process, ultimately contributing to the field’s evolving understanding of ethical stewardship and public engagement with archaeological collections.
Description
Keywords
Museum studies,
Archaeology,
History