Modal Ontological Arguments and the Predicate of Existence

dc.contributor.authorKelly, Aaron
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-09T14:39:44Z
dc.date.available2019-08-09T14:39:44Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-22
dc.description.abstractIn response to the ontological argument for the existence of God, it is often objected, following Immanuel Kant, that existence is not a predicate. It is not entirely clear, however, in what way this objection has any relevance to some more recent modal versions of the ontological argument. The question that I attempt to answer is whether the modal versions of the ontological argument rely on the predication of existence, and if they do not, if they can be said to avoid Kant’s objection.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://jewlscholar.mtsu.edu/xmlui/handle/mtsu/6031
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUniversity Honors College, Middle Tennessee State Universityen_US
dc.subjectontologicalen_US
dc.subjectargumenten_US
dc.subjectmodalityen_US
dc.subjectGoden_US
dc.subjectexistenceen_US
dc.subjectnecessityen_US
dc.titleModal Ontological Arguments and the Predicate of Existenceen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
KELLY Aaron Spring 2019 Post-Defense Final Thesis.pdf
Size:
481 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.27 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: