Do Machiavellianism and Ingratiation Predict Sorority Officer Status?
Do Machiavellianism and Ingratiation Predict Sorority Officer Status?
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2020-05-06
Authors
Weissman, Georgey
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University Honors College Middle Tennessee State University
Abstract
This study examined whether individuals’ tendencies toward Machiavellianism and
ingratiation would predict their leadership behavior in sororities. Participants were 13
undergraduates who were present or past members of a sorority. Participants partook in a
survey inquiring about a) how often they engaged in ingratiation (e.g., purposefully
agreeing with and complimenting others) and b) their acceptance of “Machiavellian”
actions (e.g., manipulating others to achieve one’s goals). Participants then indicated how
often they had been elected to officer-held positions in a sorority and how long they had
held those positions. Correlational analyses indicated that employing ingratiation tactics
was the best predictor of a participant holding an officer position, and that specific
elements of Machiavellianism (i.e., desire for control, a distrust of others) predicted
running for (but not being elected to) leadership sorority positions.
Description
Keywords
Behavioral and Health Sciences,
ingratiation,
machiavellianism,
sororities